New Page 2

Home

Back

Article Published in the Express Magazine Dated February 25, 2001
General Attorney : Rajiv K. Luthra

My husband and I have parted ways and my six-year-old son is living with him. Since I wanted custody of my child, I approached my lawyer. He told me that mine is a weak case as under the law, the father is the natural guardian, and it is after him that the mother has a right. I am sad to learn that our legal system entertains gender biases.

Chitra, New Delhi

Gender equality is one of the basic principles of our Constitution as provided under Article 15. It has been held by the apex court that the normal rules of interpretation shall have to bow down to the requirement of the Constitution as the latter is supreme. Although section 6 (a) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 describes the mother as the natural guardian of a Hindu minor in respect of the minor’s person and property only after the father, the Supreme Court has clarified in a recent judgement that the word "after" need not necessarily mean “after the lifetime" of the father but "in the absence" of the father. As regards "absence" the Supreme Court has interpreted that the father's absence from the care of the minor's property or person for any reason whatever will be deemed if the father is wholly indifferent to the matters of the minor. This would be held true even if he is living with the mother or if by virtue of a mutual understanding between the parents, the mother is put exclusively in charge of the minor, or if the father is physically unable to take care of the minor either because he lives in a different place to where the mother and the minor live or because of mental incapacity. In all such situations the father can be considered to be absent and the mother, being a recognized natural guardian, can act validly on behalf of the minor. It is well settled that the welfare of the minor is of paramount consideration. Even during the lifetime of the father, if necessary, the mother can replace him, if it is found that the interest of the minor is better served. The Supreme Court has taken a strong view in this regard and upheld that whenever a dispute between the father and mother concerning the guardianship of a minor is raised in a court of law, the word "after" in the section would have no significance. Under Hindu law both parents are bound to take care of the person and property of their minor children, and have to act in the best interest of their minor children. The whole tenor of the Act is to protect the welfare of the child and, as such, the interpretation ought to be in consonance with the legislative intent. Thus, the question of custody of your child will be enquired into by the Court keeping in mind the welfare and benefit of the child without unduly privileging the father as a male.

I work in the sales department of an international car dealer and was falsely and vindictively accused for committing fraud. Although the prosecution has been dismissed after my lawyer, clearly proved my innocence, I have suffered a major set back. Besides the legal expenses, I have suffered a loss of reputation, both socially and professionally, and undergone serious mental trauma. I am very inclined to sue the man who destroyed my life and need to know my legal chances.

V. Gupta, Mumbai

You may file a suit for malicious prosecution against the person who you believe abused the process of Court by wrongfully setting the law in motion for an improper purpose. However, the onus of proof that you were maliciously prosecuted by the other party without any reasonable or probable cause lies on you. It is relevant to note that although the case against was dismissed, this does not create any presumption of the absence of reasonable and probable cause. Further, you have to prove that the prosecution was instituted with a malicious intent. If you are able to prove loss of reputation, mental pain and humiliation, damage to your person and damages for litigation expenses incurred, you may succeed in your claim for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages.

 
Disclaimer

Luthra & Luthra
Law Offices

© Copyright 2007

Disclaimer  |  Location  |  Contact Us